A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among potential neighbours around the development of a wall at a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which has attracted nationwide interest next an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times posting about René Collier as well as Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, search for to make their relatives house. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those residents of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their arranging permission by building a wall past the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Specific Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are topic to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, specifically in the sensitive coastal environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partially created, is in the proper posture. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their perspective, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal arranging disputes, in which sights of the sea are both really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, according to sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior h2o through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments, an image that has due to the fact turn out to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times claimed, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the location turned One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting instead that it's about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. Paul Feely For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as built complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. But the human component remains central: neighbours who should live together with one another extensive once the authorized expenses have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partly developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether or not it will eventually in the long run be altered, eliminated, or finished as prepared will count on the courtroom’s results. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably go on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.