A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning prospective neighbours over the development of a wall in a coastal web page in the north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has captivated countrywide focus following an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of preparing breaches, environmental concerns, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier plus the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has evolved right into a very publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction performs at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, seek out to build their relatives residence. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning permission by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore areas are subject matter to stringent controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, significantly in a very delicate coastal atmosphere like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their preparing authorization, and say the wall, that is partly designed, is in the right position. Their lawful crew has characterised the action being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their see, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of the sea are both equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary efforts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions, an image that has considering the fact that grow to be emblematic from the intensity in the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they were intended to Collect visual proof from the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Situations reported, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o through intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been coated in detail because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further more submissions on no matter whether interim Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times orders should be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment while in the legal timeline.
For the core on the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as created, goes past what was permitted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has actually been called meticulous in his assessment of organizing paperwork, maps, and problems connected towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to planning legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A personal watch, insisting rather that it is about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've described their extended-standing connection to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair only looking to develop a loved ones residence in accordance Along with the law. They deny the wall encroaches on the Particular Location of Conservation and say that every one functions are actually performed determined by Skilled information and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into The ocean all through a storm, tend not to change the underlying facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about construction of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description for any condition a large number of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become extra contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier pointed out that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from quite various Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-large water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waist-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both of those the Actual physical truth on the coastline as well as the symbolic character in the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an abnormal solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings proceed, the result stays unsure. The court docket will have to ascertain if the wall as developed complies with setting up authorization and whether or not any encroachment right into a Particular Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who should Are living along with each other long once the legal expenses are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development performs at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental challenges for instance environmental protection and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partially built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. No matter whether it's going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as prepared will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable carry on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most carefully viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.